2008 Hyundai Matrix vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2008 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 17 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Hyundai Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Hyundai Matrix. (142 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Hyundai Matrix | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Hyundai | Jeep |
Model | Matrix | CJ3A |
Year Released | 2008 | 1951 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1127 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2040 mm |