2008 Hyundai Matrix vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 2008 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 273 kg more than 2008 Hyundai Matrix.
Because 1968 Jaguar E Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar E Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Hyundai Matrix | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
| Make | Hyundai | Jaguar |
| Model | Matrix | E Type |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 92.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 106 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1127 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 63 L |
