2008 Hyundai Matrix vs. 1973 Mazda 929
To start off, 2008 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,768 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Hyundai Matrix (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 166 kg more than 1973 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Hyundai Matrix (141 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Hyundai Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Hyundai Matrix | 1973 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Hyundai | Mazda |
Model | Matrix | 929 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |