2008 Hyundai Matrix vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2008 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 653 kg more than 2008 Hyundai Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor (346 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Hyundai Matrix. (142 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Hyundai Matrix | 2005 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | Hyundai | Mitsubishi |
Model | Matrix | Endeavor |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1599 cc | 3835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 346 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1127 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 81 L |