2008 Hyundai Terracan vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Hyundai Terracan is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Hyundai Terracan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Hyundai Terracan (162 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (107 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Hyundai Terracan should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Hyundai Terracan weights approximately 1137 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Hyundai Terracan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Hyundai Terracan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Hyundai Terracan (345 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2008 Hyundai Terracan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Hyundai Terracan | 1991 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Hyundai | Renault |
| Model | Terracan | Clio |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1991 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2902 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 107 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 97.1 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.4:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 13 seconds | 9.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2162 kg | 1025 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 43 L |
