2008 Isuzu I-290 vs. 1966 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-290 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-290 should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. (89 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu I-290 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu I-290 | 1966 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
Model | I-290 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 89 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2390 mm |