2008 Isuzu I-290 vs. 1969 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-290 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1969 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-290 should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph Herald.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu I-290 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Isuzu I-290 | 1969 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Isuzu | Triumph |
| Model | I-290 | Herald |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2901 cc | 1145 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 29 L |
