2008 Isuzu I-290 vs. 2010 BMW M3
To start off, 2010 BMW M3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Isuzu I-290. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Isuzu I-290 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2008 Isuzu I-290. (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2008 Isuzu I-290.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu I-290. (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu I-290.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu I-290 | 2010 BMW M3 | |
Make | Isuzu | BMW |
Model | I-290 | M3 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8300 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1803 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1392 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2761 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 63 L |