2008 Isuzu I-290 vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Isuzu I-290. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Isuzu I-290 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2008 Isuzu I-290. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2008 Isuzu I-290.
Because 2008 Isuzu I-290 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Isuzu I-290. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Isuzu I-290 | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Audi |
| Model | I-290 | A6 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2901 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 75 L |
