2008 Isuzu I-350 vs. 1968 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 3,699 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1968 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 1968 NSU Ro 80.
Because 2008 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 NSU Ro 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Isuzu I-350 | 1968 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Isuzu | NSU |
| Model | I-350 | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3699 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 37 L |
