2008 Isuzu I-350 vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,456 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu I-350 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu I-350 | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Isuzu | Rover |
Model | I-350 | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3456 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1410 mm |