2008 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2002 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2002 Ford Falcon. (221 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Falcon.
Because 2008 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3150 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu I-350. (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu I-350 | 2002 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Isuzu | Ford |
Model | I-350 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3699 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3150 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 59 L |