2008 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 3,699 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2008 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Subaru R2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Isuzu I-350 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Subaru |
| Model | I-350 | R2 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3699 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 58 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 30 L |
