2008 Isuzu I-350 vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,699 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (242 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (175 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75.
Because 2008 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu I-350 (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu I-350 | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Isuzu | Rover |
Model | I-350 | 75 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3699 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 65 L |