2008 Isuzu KB vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 100 kg more than 1967 Mercury Park Lane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (626 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 436 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (190 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu KB | 1967 Mercury Park Lane | |
Make | Isuzu | Mercury |
Model | KB | Park Lane |
Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 6990 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 340 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 626 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3130 mm |