2008 Isuzu KB vs. 1972 Volvo 164
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 100 kg more than 1972 Volvo 164.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Volvo 164 (241 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (190 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1972 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu KB | 1972 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
Model | KB | 164 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2978 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |