2008 Isuzu KB vs. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 15 kg more than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2008 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass (203 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (190 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu KB | 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Isuzu | Oldsmobile |
Model | KB | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2008 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2260 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2740 mm |