2008 Isuzu KB vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 3,165 cc, 2008 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 45 kg more than 2004 Volvo S60.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S60 (401 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (265 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu KB | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
Model | KB | S60 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3165 cc | 2401 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
Torque | 265 Nm | 401 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 172 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.7 seconds | 5.7 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1625 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |