2008 Isuzu KB vs. 2006 Rover 25
To start off, 2008 Isuzu KB is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 25 would be higher. At 3,165 cc, 2008 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 585 kg more than 2006 Rover 25.
Because 2008 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu KB (265 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 25. (110 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Isuzu KB | 2006 Rover 25 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Rover |
| Model | KB | 25 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3165 cc | 1396 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1085 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.6 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
