2008 Isuzu KB vs. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 3,165 cc, 2008 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 409 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Because 2008 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (265 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu KB | 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt | |
Make | Isuzu | Chevrolet |
Model | KB | Cobalt |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3165 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
Torque | 265 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1261 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.6 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 49 L |