2008 Isuzu KB vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 493 kg more than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (574 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (190 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 2008 Isuzu KB has manual transmission. 2008 Isuzu KB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu KB | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
Model | KB | XF |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 5000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 470 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 574 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |