2008 Isuzu KB vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 3,165 cc, 2008 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Isuzu KB weights approximately 312 kg more than 2010 Kia Cee'd.
Because 2008 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu KB (265 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (255 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Isuzu KB | 2010 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Isuzu | Kia |
Model | KB | Cee'd |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3165 cc | 1582 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 265 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 172 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1358 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.6 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 53 L |