2008 Isuzu KB vs. 2012 BMW X3
To start off, 2012 BMW X3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 3,165 cc, 2008 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW X3 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2008 Isuzu KB.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW X3 (560 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu KB. (265 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2012 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Isuzu KB | 2012 BMW X3 | |
| Make | Isuzu | BMW |
| Model | KB | X3 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3165 cc | 2993 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 560 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 172 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.7 seconds | 6.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1875 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.6 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 67 L |
