2008 Jaguar X-Type vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 349 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2008 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jaguar X-Type | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | X-Type | 3 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 83.6 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1589 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.6 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 55 L |