2008 Jaguar XF vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XF is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XF weights approximately 869 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2008 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1978 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jaguar XF | 1978 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
| Model | XF | Colt |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2965 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1679 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2310 mm |
