2008 Jaguar XF vs. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XF is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XF weights approximately 360 kg more than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jaguar XF | 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | XF | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 411 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1482 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2760 mm |
