2008 Jaguar XF vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XF (411 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XF weights approximately 576 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XF (560 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan C 52. (354 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jaguar XF | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
| Model | XF | C 52 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 411 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2830 mm |
