2008 Jaguar XF vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XF (411 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XF weights approximately 42 kg more than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XF (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jaguar XF | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XF | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 411 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 78 L |