2008 Jaguar XF vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XF (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (162 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XF weights approximately 301 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XF (436 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (215 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jaguar XF | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
Model | XF | Outlander |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2720 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 436 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1771 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 59 L |