2008 Jaguar XJ vs. 1966 Seat 1500
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJ is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XJ (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 524 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jaguar XJ | 1966 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Seat |
| Model | XJ | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4200 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2110 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2660 mm |
