2008 Jaguar XJ vs. 2004 Volvo V40
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo V40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 2004 Volvo V40. (169 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo V40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 385 kg more than 2004 Volvo V40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XJ (553 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo V40. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo V40.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jaguar XJ | 2004 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJ | V40 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 553 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 60 L |