2008 Jaguar XJ vs. 2010 Lexus RX
To start off, 2010 Lexus RX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2010 Lexus RX. (295 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2010 Lexus RX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus RX weights approximately 385 kg more than 2008 Jaguar XJ.
Because 2008 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lexus RX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jaguar XJ | 2010 Lexus RX | |
Make | Jaguar | Lexus |
Model | XJ | RX |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1885 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 73 L |