2008 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 219 kg more than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2008 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jaguar XJ6 | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | XJ6 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2110 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2680 mm |
