2008 Jaguar XJR vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJR is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XJR (505 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. (363 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. 2008 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1989 Matra-Simca M25 has manual transmission. 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jaguar XJR | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Matra-Simca |
| Model | XJR | M25 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3995 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 505 Nm | 363 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
