2008 Jaguar XJR vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus M250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus M250 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 1170 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XJR (505 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250. 2008 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 2000 Lotus M250 has manual transmission. 2000 Lotus M250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jaguar XJR | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
| Model | XJR | M250 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3995 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
| Torque | 505 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 72 L |
