2008 Jaguar XJR vs. 2004 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Murano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Murano would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 49 kg more than 2004 Nissan Murano.
Because 2004 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XJR (505 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Murano. (328 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jaguar XJR | 2004 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XJR | Murano |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 245 HP |
Torque | 505 Nm | 328 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1796 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 82 L |