2008 Jaguar XJR vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XJR (400 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2012 Holden Calais. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Calais.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XJR (561 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jaguar XJR | 2012 Holden Calais | |
Make | Jaguar | Holden |
Model | XJR | Calais |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 561 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |