2008 Jaguar XK vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse

To start off, 2008 Jaguar XK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XK (410 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (147 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XK weights approximately 465 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XK (560 Nm) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (214 Nm). This means 2008 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Jaguar XK 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse
Make Jaguar Mitsubishi
Model XK Eclipse
Year Released 2008 2004
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4196 cc 2376 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 410 HP 147 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 560 Nm 214 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.3 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1785 kg 1320 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.3 L/100km 9.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 71 L 62 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]