2008 Jaguar XK8 vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XK8 (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (198 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1994 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XK8 (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 200. (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2008 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jaguar XK8 | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | XK8 | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |