2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,584 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 863 kg more than 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1961 Alfa Romeo 2600 | |
Make | Jeep | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Cherokee | 2600 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2584 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |