2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1965 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1540 kg more than 1965 Nissan Cedric.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1965 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Cherokee | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2520 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |