2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1972 Rover 2000
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 683 kg more than 1972 Rover 2000.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Rover 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover 2000. (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1972 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Cherokee | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1978 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2640 mm |