2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1972 Rover 3.5
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 314 kg more than 1972 Rover 3.5.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Rover 3.5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover 3.5. (276 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover 3.5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1972 Rover 3.5 | |
| Make | Jeep | Rover |
| Model | Cherokee | 3.5 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 276 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1949 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2820 mm |
