2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 581 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (307 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Jeep | Triumph |
| Model | Cherokee | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 307 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 1248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |
