2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (210 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1071 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (313 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Cherokee | 323 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 313 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 77.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |
