2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 959 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Opel Ascona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (101 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Jeep | Opel |
| Model | Cherokee | Ascona |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Top Speed | 169 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1949 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2580 mm |
