2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 659 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (307 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (180 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1993 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Jeep | Rover |
| Model | Cherokee | 200 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 307 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1410 mm |
