2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1994 Rover 100
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 100 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1994 Rover 100. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 959 kg more than 1994 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (307 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover 100. (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1994 Rover 100 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Cherokee | 100 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 307 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1829 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1380 mm |