2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,775 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 760 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Cherokee | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2775 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 55 L |