2008 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 702 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Jeep Cherokee | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | Jeep | Proton |
Model | Cherokee | 300 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2427 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1817 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2450 mm |